05.20.08

In praise of difficult women

Posted in Sunday Times Columns at 8:57 pm by Sarah

Note: Sunday’s column. Thanks to all the commenters on my earlier posts for different perspectives…

The accounts of Nuala O’Faolain’s funeral were very moving, in particular the eulogy by Marian Finucane. Though we knew a lot about O’Faolain through her writing, we’ve learned even more in the short few weeks since Finucane conducted that final interview with such great skill. The writer’s many friends have told us about her sense of humour and her compassion. The same friends readily admitted, as the author herself did, that Nuala could be a difficult woman : her relentless honesty about herself and others was both inconvenient and painful.

I couldn’t help wondering then why, this difficult, honest, woman had a catholic funeral. In that last interview she made perfectly clear though she had a spiritual life she did not believe in God. She said that were she to cave in to faith as her death approached, it would be proof that her brain tumours had affected her sanity. But still the prayers were said and the last rites performed. Going with the flow and having the funeral mass is the easy thing to do : it reassures the living and the rites are so familiar to us they are themselves a comfort to the bereaved. But listening to her friends speak about her, it struck me that the last thing Nuala O’Faolain did in her life was take the path of least resistance.

On the other hand it was just these inconsistencies that told us so much about her and ourselves. Don’t we all struggle between ideals and doubts? We share her confusion between what we’ve been taught, what we questioned, what we feel and what ultimately we accept we’ll never really know. We each end up trying to get through the day and our lives as best we can. Some people can do it easily enough by simply knuckling down and getting on with it. Others, like Nuala struggle all their lives in an effort to bridge the gap between what’s expected of us and what’d we secretly like to say or do.

They’re the ones who change things either directly or simply by keeping us company in our private struggles. There’s nothing worse than feeling miserable or angry and worrying that you are alone. There’s nothing like the huge relief of discovering that other people feel just like you. That’s the gift that writers like O’Faolain give to us. They are willing to take huge risks, and get it wrong. But every now and then they’ll get it right and lift a burden from our shoulders.

We loved her writing, and that last interview, because it was honest if unnerving. She raged against death and the drink that consumed too much of her life. She raged on behalf of women. I always feel like slapping hard the face of bleached, tanned, successful women who simper that they aren’t feminists. Have they no idea what was done for them by women like O’Faolain, Nell McCafferty and Finucane?

Women who instead of keeping quiet and getting on with it, through their writing, their broadcasting and their campaigning, won us so much. Not just equal rights through legislation, but the right to simply express ourselves without being considered insane and rebellious.

Your Sunday papers will be littered today with female columnists like me who can casually complain about the oppressiveness of religion, children, marriage and housework. Forty years ago a woman making those complaints would have been considered insane and prescribed valium.

O’Faolain never flinched from telling uncomfortable truths about her family, herself or Irish society. In so doing, she educated us about humanity and encouraged us in our compassion. Her rage did much for us.

Of course, sadly, it seems like it didn’t do her much good. She confessed she found relationships difficult and experienced great despair and loneliness. That’s the problem with being difficult. A difficult person might be hard on those around them, but principally they are hardest on themselves. Others benefited from the anger of say, Noel Browne, a notorious crank who did so much for our health system. Goal’s John O’Shea is forever ranting on the airwaves. Politicians like Patricia McKenna or Michael D. Higgins are so passionate that they really look perfectly miserable. Truth be told, we don’t take angry people all that seriously. Anyone that emotional can’t be in control. We reserve our admiration for the cool heads; the compromisers; the deal makers. If you lose it, you’ve lost it.

Personally, I love difficult people because they are so compulsively honest. Difficult women are especially rare. The ideal woman is submissive, selfless and gives up herself for others. The truly feminine woman will smile sweetly, smooth over disagreements and never put a foot wrong. What a bore. I’d rather stick forks in my thighs under the table than preserve that rictus grin on my face as I sweetly absorb the hypocritical nonsense of others.

The interesting woman won’t hold back. She’ll tell inappropriate intimate details to people she just met. She’ll curse, disagree, force others to tell the truth and call it like it is. I’m fortunate, and unfortunate to know women like this. They can be the best in the world and the worst. That energy and ruthless honesty can be fabulous but tiring and occasionally hysterical. But you’ll feel alive in their presence instead of sitting around with a pain in your face from the effort of not causing offence.

But the pressure to do just that is immense. I’m forever torn between wanting the easy life and wanting to scream my head off. But screaming hurts my head before it hurts anyone else’s and I go through phases of deciding to keep quiet. That works for a while but eventually it starts to hurt too. Do you ever read something, hear a voice or see a painting and loudly exhale? And you realise you haven’t been breathing? You haven’t been able to open your mouth properly for fear of what might escape. People like O’Faolain opened their mouths and screamed so the rest of us could breathe.

Of course, I’m identifying with her which is a bit self-obsessive but also an inspiration. Women like her beat back the bushes and made a path for women like me to walk down. Thinking about her last week, I remembered a day when I came home from work after a row with some over-testosteroned boss. I wept to my boyfriend, now husband, wishing that I hadn’t caused the row by speaking up about some corporate injustice. “I should just stay quiet” I resolved. “No you shouldn’t” he said, “because then you become a blip. And you are not a blip”. This cheered me up no end. I would not be a blip.

O’Faolain was no blip. She was a force of nature: stormy, cyclonic, changeable, blowing from different directions, powerful, sunny and miserable too. I wish we had more like her.

Harris tries to re-write history

Posted in Uncategorized at 2:13 pm by Sarah

He gets more bizarre by the day.

Eoghan Harris’s column tells blatant porkies about an extraordinary exchange a few weeks ago on The Last Word.

The debate was with Michael Clifford of the Sunday Tribune in which Harris was accusing Clifford of being scurrilous (I think he used that exact word) in his pursuit of Ahern in the Mahon Tribunal. Clifford put forward a magnificent defence, mainly for its measured tone in the face of outrageous provocation. At one point Clifford referred to Eoghan as Mr Harris. Eoghan interrupted and pointed out that Clifford’s refusal to call him his correct title of Senator Harris was part of a his agenda to undermine supporters of Ahern. It was a really odd, stupid, pompous, paranoid correction to make and when he was finished Cooper and Clifford were silent for a couple of seconds before Clifford responded and began to use “senator” in a tone dripping with sarcasm which Harris fully deserved.

But the Senator tries to re-interpret the incident as follows while complaining about Quentin Fottrell’s radio review column in the IT. Fottrell had made the error of forgetting Harris’s title in another interview.

“Fottrell’s fulmination is so nakedly needy in its desire to diss me that I wonder if the Irish Times has not a duty of care to protect him from accusation of an agenda. After all, this is the second time he has stalked me since I complained about him calling me “Mister Harris” rather than “Eoghan Harris” in the course of a radio debate.

The “Mister” usage is boorish. Even in the most heated debate I would not dream of degrading Fintan O’Toole — or indeed Fottrell — by calling them “Mister O’Toole” or “Mister Fottrell”. The only other person to use that patronising prefix was Michael Clifford of the Sunday Tribune at the start of an argument about Ahern. Stupidly, I sarcastically intoned “Senator” in response.

Stupidly, because the following week Fottrell proved Garret FitzGerald’s point about the danger of irony in Irish politics by saying I wanted Clifford to call me “Senator”. Actually I just wanted him to stop calling me “Mister Harris” in the petulant tone which always accompanies that particular prefix.”

What a big fib. He was not being ironic or sarcastic when he made the correction. I heard it live! Instead he placed it in context as part of an agenda against him. Doing a “Ah I was only messing” routine is the kind of thing my 4 year old does in defence of silly behaviour.

Honestly, could anyone conceive of Shane Ross or David Norris behaving like this? And they’re elected. Harris was appointed.

Lisbon links

Posted in Uncategorized at 12:09 pm by Sarah

Just two..

I intend to read as much of the treaty as I can.

Particualarly the preamble and the charter.

Anyone else interested check out links here

05.16.08

Uuuuuuuuuugh

Posted in Sunday Times Columns at 10:01 am by Sarah

“Mammy! Mammy! I found a baby worm!!”

Mammy braces herself.

“Look Mammy!” and offers an outstreched hand holding a..

SLUG.

uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuugh. puke.

05.14.08

Nuala

Posted in Uncategorized at 2:37 pm by Sarah

Betty and I were wondering this morning. Nuala O’Faolain made clear in her interview with Marian (which was wonderful, by the way, not just for Nuala’s honesty, but the way Marian conducted it. Technically brilliant -no sympathy – challenging, straight questions and how hard that must have been when it was her friend – she is often maligned, Marian, but she showed incredible skill).

Anyway…Nuala made it clear that she did not believe in God and said, if she started thinking that way now, then she’d know for sure she had brain tumours. But then she died, and from the extracts I’ve read, Marian gave a wonderful eulogy. BUT why did she have a catholic funeral? Did she leave instructions that were thwarted by the family? Did she convert at the last minute? Was it left ambigious and the family and church went ahead on the basis, that maybe, we’re all entitled to funeral rites just in case? Given how clear she was in her views just…3, 4 weeks ago, it seemed odd.

BSG and other news

Posted in Sunday Times Columns at 11:31 am by Sarah

Just watched the Mini Series. Woah – those Cylons sure hate humanity!

Does anyone know if in the original, they actually found earth?

Onto series 1….

In other news, I found myself, well alright, I voluntarily went to Atlantic Homecare the other day. I am sure I needed something terribly important. Can’t remember what it was now BUT I came across these cool plastic drawer dividers – they clip together in a grid and you put them in your sock/knicker drawer. No more rooting for knickers and socks! Everything is now neatly in a little square. As I was tidying I decided to throw out baggy knickers and too small knickers. I have to stop buying “small” smalls. I am 36, going on 37, my arse is now medium.

05.12.08

AA Gill in DC

Posted in Uncategorized at 6:23 pm by Sarah

A wonderfully written article about DC by AA Gill. It’s supposed to be a restaurant review but he only gets round to the food in the last paragraph. Well worth a read.

Damnit

Posted in Domestic/Relationships at 2:49 pm by Sarah

They announced the Lisbon Treaty voting day for June 12th. I won’t be here to VOTE YES and counteract the No votes of the wilfully contrarian.

Can someone who was going to Vote No abstain please?

05.08.08

Tribalism and all that

Posted in Uncategorized at 12:11 pm by Sarah

I avoided reports of the shin-dig at the Boyne. The love-in between Fianna Fail and the Unionists. Of course no surprise really that they get along so well since they share the sense of entitlement to power and a resentment that they should be expected to treat minorities with respect. Even I was suprised to learn how determinedly petty they can be. Not one Fine Gael councillor in Meath – not one – was invited to the event. Invitations were easy to come by, but only if you were of the right party. The guns maybe silent, but tribalism hasn’t gone away you know.

Oh well, the Da is gone to Serbia. I doubt he’ll see much there that will top the carry-on here.

05.06.08

The Senator on The Brother

Posted in Uncategorized at 1:19 pm by Sarah

My brother Edward has been made president of the IAVI. A challenging position given the trouble in which they find themselves these days.

Senator Ross gives his view. I agree with him. He’s got a job to do. Lot of defensiveness to be dealt with. Though I can never help noticing that the auctioneers in these parts with dreadful reputations for skullduggery have no problem getting customers.

« Previous Page« Previous entries « Previous Page · Next Page » Next entries »Next Page »

Bad Behavior has blocked 542 access attempts in the last 7 days.