<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law and Order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/</link>
	<description>An Irish woman's social, political and domestic commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:34:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: leon</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-123674</link>
		<dc:creator>leon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-123674</guid>
		<description>The illegal tinting/blackening only applies to the windsreen and front side windows, the rear and rear side windows can be as opaque as you like, these are standrad on a lot of SUVs (like mine).

It is hanndy to see where people are looking on roundabouts as this is generally a better indication of where they are going than there indication, but the poor level of road knowledge and craft in Ireland compared to our immediate neighbours is shocking.

Country drivers may be faster at pulling out, but there failure to use lanes, junctions and roundabouts is terrible, and often horrific in dublin suburbs, if someone does something really stupid in front of you 95% of the time its a country reg, someone over 60 or a winker in a BMW (ans therefore obviously more imnportant than anybody else).  Why do most irish drivers insist on using the handbrake at traffic lights, aarrrggghhhh, hold the bloody thing on the bite and just move as a column when the lights change instead of drip feeding away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The illegal tinting/blackening only applies to the windsreen and front side windows, the rear and rear side windows can be as opaque as you like, these are standrad on a lot of SUVs (like mine).</p>
<p>It is hanndy to see where people are looking on roundabouts as this is generally a better indication of where they are going than there indication, but the poor level of road knowledge and craft in Ireland compared to our immediate neighbours is shocking.</p>
<p>Country drivers may be faster at pulling out, but there failure to use lanes, junctions and roundabouts is terrible, and often horrific in dublin suburbs, if someone does something really stupid in front of you 95% of the time its a country reg, someone over 60 or a winker in a BMW (ans therefore obviously more imnportant than anybody else).  Why do most irish drivers insist on using the handbrake at traffic lights, aarrrggghhhh, hold the bloody thing on the bite and just move as a column when the lights change instead of drip feeding away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JVC</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-123100</link>
		<dc:creator>JVC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-123100</guid>
		<description>This is the situation in the UK. Why can we not do the same!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------
If an Enforcement Officer thinks the front windows or windscreen may be tinted beyond the legal limit, they will test it using a hand-held meter. If the level of light transmitted is less than 30%, there is an immediate prohibition on the vehicle and the driver has to take it off the road. The driver has 14 days to remove the illegal tint and bring it for inspection to a Goods Vehicle Station. If satisfactory, the prohibition is removed. If the prohibition is not removed within 14 days, prosecution can result. If the level of light is over 30% but under 45%, a &#039;delayed prohibition&#039; is issued, giving the driver 10 days when s/he may continue to use the car and sort the problem. If the level of light is between 45% and 70%, the driver is given an &#039;advisory inspection notice&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the situation in the UK. Why can we not do the same!!!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
If an Enforcement Officer thinks the front windows or windscreen may be tinted beyond the legal limit, they will test it using a hand-held meter. If the level of light transmitted is less than 30%, there is an immediate prohibition on the vehicle and the driver has to take it off the road. The driver has 14 days to remove the illegal tint and bring it for inspection to a Goods Vehicle Station. If satisfactory, the prohibition is removed. If the prohibition is not removed within 14 days, prosecution can result. If the level of light is over 30% but under 45%, a &#8216;delayed prohibition&#8217; is issued, giving the driver 10 days when s/he may continue to use the car and sort the problem. If the level of light is between 45% and 70%, the driver is given an &#8216;advisory inspection notice&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-122082</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-122082</guid>
		<description>I drive, but not at the moment, since I don&#039;t need a car. As for being able to see whether somebody is looking at the road, yes it might be useful in that situation, but what are you doing in that situation? You&#039;re not looking at the other cars on the road! It&#039;s not looking at somebody&#039;s face that is dangerous, it&#039;s not paying attention to other things that make it a hazzard. You&#039;re dividing your attention between interpreting somebody&#039;s facial expression from a distance, while paying attention to oncoming traffic, the speed limit, your distance from other cars.... And, it&#039;s probably distracting for other drivers. If I&#039;m driving and I notice that somebody is staring at me, I&#039;m going to start wondering why that is. Do I know them? Is there something wrong with my car? Did I cut them off? Are they waiting for me to do something? Those are the kind of questions that automatically come to mind. 

So yes, there are situations where looking at someone&#039;s face might prevent an accident, but it&#039;s just more likely to cause an accident by dividing your attention or distracting someone else. If the entire driving population adopted your tactic, then there would be an increase in the number of accidents.

Tinted windows may well be illegal, but not because they affect the driver&#039;s vision, but because the Gardai want to be able to see who is in a car. The law is very vague on the matter I believe. Supposedly, you can tint side and back windows as much as you like, but the windscreen is only allowed  to be tinted to a certain degree. I believe the reason that the Gardai don&#039;t prosecute is because they don&#039;t have the equipment to test the degree of tint and the law is vague, something about &quot;unduly&quot; tinted windows being illegal.  At any rate, I don&#039;t remember mentioning tinted windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I drive, but not at the moment, since I don&#8217;t need a car. As for being able to see whether somebody is looking at the road, yes it might be useful in that situation, but what are you doing in that situation? You&#8217;re not looking at the other cars on the road! It&#8217;s not looking at somebody&#8217;s face that is dangerous, it&#8217;s not paying attention to other things that make it a hazzard. You&#8217;re dividing your attention between interpreting somebody&#8217;s facial expression from a distance, while paying attention to oncoming traffic, the speed limit, your distance from other cars&#8230;. And, it&#8217;s probably distracting for other drivers. If I&#8217;m driving and I notice that somebody is staring at me, I&#8217;m going to start wondering why that is. Do I know them? Is there something wrong with my car? Did I cut them off? Are they waiting for me to do something? Those are the kind of questions that automatically come to mind. </p>
<p>So yes, there are situations where looking at someone&#8217;s face might prevent an accident, but it&#8217;s just more likely to cause an accident by dividing your attention or distracting someone else. If the entire driving population adopted your tactic, then there would be an increase in the number of accidents.</p>
<p>Tinted windows may well be illegal, but not because they affect the driver&#8217;s vision, but because the Gardai want to be able to see who is in a car. The law is very vague on the matter I believe. Supposedly, you can tint side and back windows as much as you like, but the windscreen is only allowed  to be tinted to a certain degree. I believe the reason that the Gardai don&#8217;t prosecute is because they don&#8217;t have the equipment to test the degree of tint and the law is vague, something about &#8220;unduly&#8221; tinted windows being illegal.  At any rate, I don&#8217;t remember mentioning tinted windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-121883</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-121883</guid>
		<description>Niall I&#039;d be interested to know if you drive?

And PLEASE how can you possibly argue that the ability to see if another driver is looking at his CD player instead of at other cars is dangerous?

Oh and the point which you missed is that darkened windows ARE illegal. I forget what the problem about prosecution is again but legally you are not supposed to have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Niall I&#8217;d be interested to know if you drive?</p>
<p>And PLEASE how can you possibly argue that the ability to see if another driver is looking at his CD player instead of at other cars is dangerous?</p>
<p>Oh and the point which you missed is that darkened windows ARE illegal. I forget what the problem about prosecution is again but legally you are not supposed to have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-121770</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 10:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-121770</guid>
		<description>Sarah, you may well be the world&#039;s greatest driver, but everybody thinks that they&#039;re a good driver, and everybody has their own &#039;tricks&#039; that supposedly work for them, but which end up pissing everybody else off. Even something as simple as pulling in on the hard shoulder shouldn&#039;t happen but people do it to be polite and it just ends up encouraging speeding by other drivers. 

&quot;AND this thing on the back, that I suppose is for easing wind resistance? like a wing attached to the boot.&quot;

This sentence makes me doubt your claim to be the world&#039;s greatest driver! The &#039;thing&#039; you&#039;re referring to is a spoiler, and while its function is supposed to be to reduce drag and lift, people put them on cars because they think that they look nice. They&#039;re far from uncommon and you probably don&#039;t notice them on most cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah, you may well be the world&#8217;s greatest driver, but everybody thinks that they&#8217;re a good driver, and everybody has their own &#8216;tricks&#8217; that supposedly work for them, but which end up pissing everybody else off. Even something as simple as pulling in on the hard shoulder shouldn&#8217;t happen but people do it to be polite and it just ends up encouraging speeding by other drivers. </p>
<p>&#8220;AND this thing on the back, that I suppose is for easing wind resistance? like a wing attached to the boot.&#8221;</p>
<p>This sentence makes me doubt your claim to be the world&#8217;s greatest driver! The &#8216;thing&#8217; you&#8217;re referring to is a spoiler, and while its function is supposed to be to reduce drag and lift, people put them on cars because they think that they look nice. They&#8217;re far from uncommon and you probably don&#8217;t notice them on most cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-121178</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-121178</guid>
		<description>on FG: Well, OTHER people clearly do agree with their policies. If they didn&#039;t they wouldn&#039;t be the second largest party in the Dail. I simply acknowledge the realities of the status quo and vote tactically accordingly. I could be against EVERYONE because no party really represents me. But that&#039;s not practical. And I am practical.

And Niall, you are just wrong. There are lots of situations where seeing the driver&#039;s face tells you a lot. You can tell if they are away with the birds, or fiddling with the radio or on the phone and have just NO idea that you are there, if they are looking left and do not see the car approaching from the right. I do try to obey the rules of the road - but to be safe you have to use plenty of other senses and assume that the other guy will NOT do so. I use this all the time to predict driver behaviour and quite frankly it works. Its amazing what other drivers don&#039;t see. When I can tell they can&#039;t see i can get out of their way.... 

Oh and don&#039;t you remember that ad about experienced drivers where the older guy saw the ball underneath the van and guessed a child would run out and chase after it? That&#039;s not obeying the rules of the road - that&#039;s using experience to observe the environment beyond yourself and your car. 

Point of information:  I passed my driving test first time :-) all due to the Glasnevin School of Motoring. A guy called Frank, who used to be a garda I think. He was SO strict. For one lesson he jacked up the front of the car in his driveway  and made me steer for half an hour. He had a stop watch and I had to full turns, while looking all around me in 7 seconds. For another, I had to drive around an estate close to the kerb and he&#039;d have me stop and I was supposed to be 1ft from the kerb. He said I had terrible judgement to my left, ie couldn&#039;t tell distance and that&#039;s what the exercise was for. 

THEN when I did my test, in Rathgar, you know the way the guys say nothing? So when he told me I had passed, he said &quot;you&#039;ve done a lot of country driving&quot;. and I said, YES! I have, how can you tell?&quot; So its called &quot;progress&quot;. The length of time it takes you to move up the gears from a stationary position. Country drivers do it faster (and better) than city drivers cos they are used to pulling onto roads where everyone is driving at 90 :-) Interesting, I thought...

ANYWAY, I have high standards for driving.  Its&#039; my thing. So don&#039;t you tell me about driving Niall! eek, gone overboard.....calm down Sarah, you are an EXCELLENT driver. relax....bla........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on FG: Well, OTHER people clearly do agree with their policies. If they didn&#8217;t they wouldn&#8217;t be the second largest party in the Dail. I simply acknowledge the realities of the status quo and vote tactically accordingly. I could be against EVERYONE because no party really represents me. But that&#8217;s not practical. And I am practical.</p>
<p>And Niall, you are just wrong. There are lots of situations where seeing the driver&#8217;s face tells you a lot. You can tell if they are away with the birds, or fiddling with the radio or on the phone and have just NO idea that you are there, if they are looking left and do not see the car approaching from the right. I do try to obey the rules of the road &#8211; but to be safe you have to use plenty of other senses and assume that the other guy will NOT do so. I use this all the time to predict driver behaviour and quite frankly it works. Its amazing what other drivers don&#8217;t see. When I can tell they can&#8217;t see i can get out of their way&#8230;. </p>
<p>Oh and don&#8217;t you remember that ad about experienced drivers where the older guy saw the ball underneath the van and guessed a child would run out and chase after it? That&#8217;s not obeying the rules of the road &#8211; that&#8217;s using experience to observe the environment beyond yourself and your car. </p>
<p>Point of information:  I passed my driving test first time <img src='http://www.sarahcarey.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  all due to the Glasnevin School of Motoring. A guy called Frank, who used to be a garda I think. He was SO strict. For one lesson he jacked up the front of the car in his driveway  and made me steer for half an hour. He had a stop watch and I had to full turns, while looking all around me in 7 seconds. For another, I had to drive around an estate close to the kerb and he&#8217;d have me stop and I was supposed to be 1ft from the kerb. He said I had terrible judgement to my left, ie couldn&#8217;t tell distance and that&#8217;s what the exercise was for. </p>
<p>THEN when I did my test, in Rathgar, you know the way the guys say nothing? So when he told me I had passed, he said &#8220;you&#8217;ve done a lot of country driving&#8221;. and I said, YES! I have, how can you tell?&#8221; So its called &#8220;progress&#8221;. The length of time it takes you to move up the gears from a stationary position. Country drivers do it faster (and better) than city drivers cos they are used to pulling onto roads where everyone is driving at 90 <img src='http://www.sarahcarey.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Interesting, I thought&#8230;</p>
<p>ANYWAY, I have high standards for driving.  Its&#8217; my thing. So don&#8217;t you tell me about driving Niall! eek, gone overboard&#8230;..calm down Sarah, you are an EXCELLENT driver. relax&#8230;.bla&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An SpailpÃ­n FÃ¡nach</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-121059</link>
		<dc:creator>An SpailpÃ­n FÃ¡nach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-121059</guid>
		<description>&quot;So, I know everyone accuses me of being a totally blind sided FGer. This is actually not true since I completely disagree with many (nearly all?) of their policies.&quot;

If you disagree with many, nearly all, of Fine Gael&#039;s policies, how to expect people not born into the faith, as you were, to vote for them Sarah? I&#039;m baffled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, I know everyone accuses me of being a totally blind sided FGer. This is actually not true since I completely disagree with many (nearly all?) of their policies.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you disagree with many, nearly all, of Fine Gael&#8217;s policies, how to expect people not born into the faith, as you were, to vote for them Sarah? I&#8217;m baffled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-120879</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-120879</guid>
		<description>Tom, trying to interpret someone&#039;s facial expression in order to predict what they&#039;re going to do is dangerous. For one thing, you can misinterpret them, and for another, it stops you giving your surroundings the attention its due. You&#039;d be much safer if you focused on the actual rules of the road. No doubt it makes people feel safe to make a connection with another driver, but if people just focused on obeying the rules of the road, we&#039;d all be much safer. I&#039;ll never get over the hypocrisy of people who complain about other drivers dangerous habits while continuing  to behave dangerously, driving fast in built up areas, pulling into yellow boxes, failing to indicate until they&#039;ve already taken a turn, getting into the wrong lane at a roundabout and pulling out on front of someone, talking on a mobile phone, looking a passenger for long periods, not using their mirrors, applying make-up, eating, drinking and not driving too close to the car on front of them. These are the same people who complain about &quot;getting done&quot; for speeding when they were only going a few miles over the limit. Here&#039;s a thought, if you want to avoid getting caught by a speed camera, how about driving a under the limit, instead of trying to drive at it! The speed limit is the maximum speed it is safe to drive at under good conditions, yet the same people who will complain about boy racers and the like, will continue to drive at the speed limit when it&#039;s frosty or when visibility is poor. The reason people get annoyed about boy racers has little to do with safety - that is simply how they justify their prejudice. Modified car owners have become the targets of this sort of bile for the same reasons that hippies and punks became targets. They&#039;re young, they&#039;re different and that&#039;s scares the shit out of people.

Nah, it&#039;s not the boy racers that&#039;s the problem, it&#039;s those people driving around  the country living out of caravans. They park them in places they shouldn&#039;t where there&#039;s no proper systems in place to deal with waste or rubbish and that lifestyle harms the environment. The kids make lots of noise. They show every intention of stealing. If you want to camp somewhere, why not go to a caravan park? Why can&#039;t we just take confiscate those caravans from those small brained idiots?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, trying to interpret someone&#8217;s facial expression in order to predict what they&#8217;re going to do is dangerous. For one thing, you can misinterpret them, and for another, it stops you giving your surroundings the attention its due. You&#8217;d be much safer if you focused on the actual rules of the road. No doubt it makes people feel safe to make a connection with another driver, but if people just focused on obeying the rules of the road, we&#8217;d all be much safer. I&#8217;ll never get over the hypocrisy of people who complain about other drivers dangerous habits while continuing  to behave dangerously, driving fast in built up areas, pulling into yellow boxes, failing to indicate until they&#8217;ve already taken a turn, getting into the wrong lane at a roundabout and pulling out on front of someone, talking on a mobile phone, looking a passenger for long periods, not using their mirrors, applying make-up, eating, drinking and not driving too close to the car on front of them. These are the same people who complain about &#8220;getting done&#8221; for speeding when they were only going a few miles over the limit. Here&#8217;s a thought, if you want to avoid getting caught by a speed camera, how about driving a under the limit, instead of trying to drive at it! The speed limit is the maximum speed it is safe to drive at under good conditions, yet the same people who will complain about boy racers and the like, will continue to drive at the speed limit when it&#8217;s frosty or when visibility is poor. The reason people get annoyed about boy racers has little to do with safety &#8211; that is simply how they justify their prejudice. Modified car owners have become the targets of this sort of bile for the same reasons that hippies and punks became targets. They&#8217;re young, they&#8217;re different and that&#8217;s scares the shit out of people.</p>
<p>Nah, it&#8217;s not the boy racers that&#8217;s the problem, it&#8217;s those people driving around  the country living out of caravans. They park them in places they shouldn&#8217;t where there&#8217;s no proper systems in place to deal with waste or rubbish and that lifestyle harms the environment. The kids make lots of noise. They show every intention of stealing. If you want to camp somewhere, why not go to a caravan park? Why can&#8217;t we just take confiscate those caravans from those small brained idiots?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-120657</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-120657</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ok, the woman who watches peoples&#039; faces when they&#039;re driving is criticising other people for driving dangerously? Tut-tut.&quot;

It&#039;s very helpful to make eye contact with drivers - particularly when you are on a bike but also when driving yourself. There is certainly nothing dangerous about it, what makes driving dangerous is sealing yourself off from the world around you with tinted windows and loud music.

The civil liberties argument just doesn&#039;t apply to these morons. Cars are dangerous, damaging to the environment, and damaging to the welfare of the rest of the community. If you want to play at being a rally driver fuck off to a rally circuit and do it, don&#039;t ask for the &#039;freedom&#039; to do it on the public roads.

For what it&#039;s worth I would extend the argument to all cars. Maximum engine size - 1.2 litres would be a good start. Speed limiters on all cars. etc etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ok, the woman who watches peoples&#8217; faces when they&#8217;re driving is criticising other people for driving dangerously? Tut-tut.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very helpful to make eye contact with drivers &#8211; particularly when you are on a bike but also when driving yourself. There is certainly nothing dangerous about it, what makes driving dangerous is sealing yourself off from the world around you with tinted windows and loud music.</p>
<p>The civil liberties argument just doesn&#8217;t apply to these morons. Cars are dangerous, damaging to the environment, and damaging to the welfare of the rest of the community. If you want to play at being a rally driver fuck off to a rally circuit and do it, don&#8217;t ask for the &#8216;freedom&#8217; to do it on the public roads.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth I would extend the argument to all cars. Maximum engine size &#8211; 1.2 litres would be a good start. Speed limiters on all cars. etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomaltach</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/comment-page-1/#comment-120447</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomaltach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/10/04/law-and-order/#comment-120447</guid>
		<description>Every time I see those souped up cars I feel a rush of contempt and I think &quot;you  small brained idiot&quot;. The low profile tyres and those dreadful sport shock absorvers are severe on the vertibrae, they make the cars seriously unconmfortable. 

But when I compose myself again, I think wait a minute, those people have their tastes and I have mine. Live and let live (this is about the ridiculous look, not the speeding!). But there is one aspect of the live and let live which these guys violate: noise. They fit exhausts which are designed to boom out loud noise. I saw an add for these somewhere which said &quot;&lt;i&gt;Do you love the throaty sound of exhaust?Do you wish the neighbours know about your arrival? Then this is the exhaust for you&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Pitifully, unredeemablty sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time I see those souped up cars I feel a rush of contempt and I think &#8220;you  small brained idiot&#8221;. The low profile tyres and those dreadful sport shock absorvers are severe on the vertibrae, they make the cars seriously unconmfortable. </p>
<p>But when I compose myself again, I think wait a minute, those people have their tastes and I have mine. Live and let live (this is about the ridiculous look, not the speeding!). But there is one aspect of the live and let live which these guys violate: noise. They fit exhausts which are designed to boom out loud noise. I saw an add for these somewhere which said &#8220;<i>Do you love the throaty sound of exhaust?Do you wish the neighbours know about your arrival? Then this is the exhaust for you</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Pitifully, unredeemablty sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
