<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/</link>
	<description>An Irish woman's social, political and domestic commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 06:34:24 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/comment-page-1/#comment-42807</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 02:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/#comment-42807</guid>
		<description>Regarding the plantiff playing football, surely he has an obligation to wear some proper kaks and not some loosy goose french knickers arrangement that allows his bits to dangle about the place for photographers to snap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the plantiff playing football, surely he has an obligation to wear some proper kaks and not some loosy goose french knickers arrangement that allows his bits to dangle about the place for photographers to snap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Privacy law in the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/comment-page-1/#comment-42618</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Privacy law in the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/#comment-42618</guid>
		<description>[...] to exercise the blogosphere - see Media Forum, and much robust common sense from Sarah Carey on GUBU). As the English cases have used the ECHR to mould breach of confidence, so we could use both it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to exercise the blogosphere &#8211; see Media Forum, and much robust common sense from Sarah Carey on GUBU). As the English cases have used the ECHR to mould breach of confidence, so we could use both it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/comment-page-1/#comment-42585</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/#comment-42585</guid>
		<description>Come on, Moll, where would a streaker hide the knife?

Twenty Major (of course) put it well: &quot;they all pretty much look the same. So if his balls were on display so were my balls and every other man in the country&#039;s balls.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, Moll, where would a streaker hide the knife?</p>
<p>Twenty Major (of course) put it well: &#8220;they all pretty much look the same. So if his balls were on display so were my balls and every other man in the country&#8217;s balls.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mol</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/comment-page-1/#comment-42553</link>
		<dc:creator>Mol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/#comment-42553</guid>
		<description>Two things

Firstly this guys mother also phoned up the Joe Duffy show and ate the head of him live on air. It was most ammusing, she went through him, informing him that under no circumstances what so ever was he ever to pull a stunt like this again. The guy couldn&#039;t get a word in edgeways. 

Secondly, if streakers can get on to pitches and golf courses so easily, what is preventing some nutter with a knife doing the same? I am only asking. 

Moll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things</p>
<p>Firstly this guys mother also phoned up the Joe Duffy show and ate the head of him live on air. It was most ammusing, she went through him, informing him that under no circumstances what so ever was he ever to pull a stunt like this again. The guy couldn&#8217;t get a word in edgeways. </p>
<p>Secondly, if streakers can get on to pitches and golf courses so easily, what is preventing some nutter with a knife doing the same? I am only asking. </p>
<p>Moll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaithÃ­</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/comment-page-1/#comment-42518</link>
		<dc:creator>DaithÃ­</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 12:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2007/02/08/privates/#comment-42518</guid>
		<description>Even if it was, um, you know (whatever deformity...), for a libel claim to succeed you also have to prove (or in Ireland, at least maintain that) the statement is &#039;false&#039;.  Now if they had written something accusing him of being a GAA exhibitionist and a danger to children, I could understand.  Even allowing for a certain role of innuendo-leading-to-falsity (which can convince a court), it&#039;s a fairly difficult case to make.  You can understand why it was jettisoned at an early stage!

I looked for the photo in the TCD library.  We don&#039;t have it.  Whoever finds it should blog it.  Anonymously, on an American server ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if it was, um, you know (whatever deformity&#8230;), for a libel claim to succeed you also have to prove (or in Ireland, at least maintain that) the statement is &#8216;false&#8217;.  Now if they had written something accusing him of being a GAA exhibitionist and a danger to children, I could understand.  Even allowing for a certain role of innuendo-leading-to-falsity (which can convince a court), it&#8217;s a fairly difficult case to make.  You can understand why it was jettisoned at an early stage!</p>
<p>I looked for the photo in the TCD library.  We don&#8217;t have it.  Whoever finds it should blog it.  Anonymously, on an American server <img src='http://www.sarahcarey.ie/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
