<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update on cancer screening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2006/05/26/update-on-cancer-screening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2006/05/26/update-on-cancer-screening/</link>
	<description>An Irish woman's social, political and domestic commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:50:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GUBU &#187; More on increased incidence of cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2006/05/26/update-on-cancer-screening/comment-page-1/#comment-14484</link>
		<dc:creator>GUBU &#187; More on increased incidence of cancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 08:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2006/05/26/update-on-cancer-screening/#comment-14484</guid>
		<description>[...] More on cancer screening. Remember my previous posts on the value of increased diagnosis and treatment of cancers, which may not be entirely necessary? See this from today&#8217;s IT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More on cancer screening. Remember my previous posts on the value of increased diagnosis and treatment of cancers, which may not be entirely necessary? See this from today&#8217;s IT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel K.</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2006/05/26/update-on-cancer-screening/comment-page-1/#comment-13042</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 14:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2006/05/26/update-on-cancer-screening/#comment-13042</guid>
		<description>Actually, I remember hearing Dr. Bill Tormey saying the same thing once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I remember hearing Dr. Bill Tormey saying the same thing once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ogie16</title>
		<link>http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2006/05/26/update-on-cancer-screening/comment-page-1/#comment-13040</link>
		<dc:creator>ogie16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sarahcarey.ie/2006/05/26/update-on-cancer-screening/#comment-13040</guid>
		<description>Like all medicine it&#039;s got to be a risk-benefit analysis. There is no such thing as a harmless solution to any ailment. Every treatment harbours some risk, it&#039;s just a matter of deciding whether the risk involved outweighs the potential benefits. For most lay-people suffering from disease, and almost all relatives of sufferers, they will opt to persue any theraly that may cure them, no matter what the consequences are. For this reason the decision is usually left to the doctor/consultant/etc. It&#039;s unfortunate, but imagine the waiting lists if every possible treatment was tried on patients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like all medicine it&#8217;s got to be a risk-benefit analysis. There is no such thing as a harmless solution to any ailment. Every treatment harbours some risk, it&#8217;s just a matter of deciding whether the risk involved outweighs the potential benefits. For most lay-people suffering from disease, and almost all relatives of sufferers, they will opt to persue any theraly that may cure them, no matter what the consequences are. For this reason the decision is usually left to the doctor/consultant/etc. It&#8217;s unfortunate, but imagine the waiting lists if every possible treatment was tried on patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

